ShareThis Page
Home

Money manager's case may go to court

| Friday, Nov. 1, 2002

Fayette County's former fiscal analyst, charged with forgery and theft in two cases, may be headed to court.

Bruce John Beard, 40, of 58 E. Fayette St., Uniontown, waived his right to a preliminary hearing Thursday on charges of forgery and theft by deception before District Justice Deberah Kula.

State police charged Beard in the case after he allegedly wrote a check for $2,500 in August from the account of the North Union Township Volunteer Fire Department, signed the names of two fire company officials without their authorization and deposited the money in his bank account.

Beard also waived his right to a preliminary hearing on charges of forgery, theft by deception and theft by unlawful taking before District Justice Rick Vernon.

Those charges were filed after Beard allegedly forged the signature of the owner of New York Pizza and Pasta in South Union Township on approximately 14 checks from the business's account totaling more than $6,000.

Beard had been hired by the North Union Township fire company and New York Pizza and Pasta to balance financial records.

Neither case is related to Beard's work as fiscal analyst for the county.

Beard resigned his position with the county shortly after the charges were filed.

Bernadette Myers is a reporter for the Daily Courier of Connellsville.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me