ShareThis Page

Pair charged in IUP dorm assault

| Thursday, Nov. 20, 2003

Two Indiana University of Pennsylvania football players were charged recently with assaulting another student in his dorm room.

Corey Allen Smith, 19, of 311 Wahr Hall, and Kirby L. Griffin, 20, of 809 Lawrence Hall, face charges of aggravated assault, simple assault and harassment.

IUP Campus Police said Smith was walking outside the dorm room of Joshua S. Szymanowski, who lives on the second floor of Wahr Hall, at about 3:40 p.m. Nov. 14.

Szymanowski told police he "yelled words" at Smith and Griffin, according to an affidavit.

Smith then allegedly went to Szymanowski's room and punched him in the mouth. Szymanowski suffered facial injuries and a deep cut to the back of his head.

When police went to Wahr Hall to serve Smith's arrest warrant, two other witnesses said they identified Griffin as the other person involved in the fight. The witnesses used a football program to identify Smith, the affidavit said.

Griffin is on the football team, but he does not play on the active squad in games, an IUP spokesman said. Smith is a redshirt freshman quarterback who is sidelined so he can be eligible to play an additional year.

Smith was a standout quarterback at Kiski Area High School and was selected co-quarterback on the North All-Star team for the spring Foothills Football Classic at Hempfield Area's Spartan Stadium. He also was selected in 2002 to the Tribune-Review Westmoreland County Finest 10 basketball team.

John H. Jackson IV, 23, also an IUP student, also was sent a summons for defiant trespass in connection with the assault. Both Smith and Griffin are scheduled to appear before District Justice Richard Orendorff, of Indiana, on Nov. 26 for a preliminary hearing.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me