ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

Travel industry seeks later start of school in Pa.

| Monday, Aug. 27, 2007

HARRISBURG -- Parents seeking relief from whiny refrains of "I'm bored" and "There's nothing to do" will likely be cheering this week as most of Pennsylvania's 501 school districts begin the 2007-08 academic year.

But for tourism industry officials, pre-Labor Day school openings are nothing to cheer about. With school in session during what's considered to be the last official week of summer, they say business takes a hit because they lose teenage employees and potential visitors.

For several years, the industry has pushed for legislation to require all school districts to begin the school year after Labor Day. The debate pits business concerns against school boards' insistence on controlling the academic calendar.

A bill sponsored by Rep. Robert Godshall, R-Montgomery, was approved this year by the House's education and tourism committees but has yet to be put to a House vote.

The idea hasn't advanced far in the face of opposition by the Pennsylvania School Boards Association and the Pennsylvania State Education Association -- the state's largest teachers' union -- who argue that drawing up a school calendar should be a local decision.

Gov. Ed Rendell is on their side.

"We don't believe that decision should be made at the state level but can best be made at the local level," Rendell spokesman Chuck Ardo said.

Nearly 90 percent of school districts start school before the holiday weekend.

Rep. Tom Tangretti, chairman of the House Tourism & Recreational Development Committee, said support for the measure among lawmakers has been building in the past year because the economic arguments for it are compelling.

A study released in September by a bipartisan legislative panel predicted that starting school after Labor Day statewide would add $378 million annually to the state's economy, including $164 million in direct travel and tourism spending. The industry generated about $27 billion in spending last year.

"I understand there's a need for local control but, by the same token, sometimes we all have to deal with things for the good of the economy," said Tangretti, D-Greensburg.

Michigan, Minnesota and Virginia are among states that require school to start after Labor Day, while Wisconsin sets Sept. 1 as the earliest start date, according to data gathered by a national parents organization, the Coalition for a Traditional School Calendar. The group supports the measure.

The early school start has proven to be a problem for Kennywood Park, which officials decided this year to close during the last week of August, community relations director Andy Quinn said.

Kennywood's parent company, which owns two other western Pennsylvania amusement parks, employs about 3,000 high school and college students. That experience provides a practical education, Quinn said.

"They're having to learn how to get along with co-workers, how to take direction," he said. "Having a summer job is not just an earning experience."

For school boards, an earlier start provides greater flexibility to make up time lost to snow days or teachers strikes to ensure they fulfill a state mandate to provide 180 days of instruction by June 30, said Tim Allwein, a lobbyist for the school boards association.

"If there's an issue with the tourism industry, they can go to the school board and advocate for a later start," Allwein said. "There are ways to do this other than to mandate it for 501 school districts."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me