ShareThis Page

Former Clinton backers won't cross party line for Palin

| Saturday, Aug. 30, 2008

Some former supporters of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign say Republican John McCain's choice of a woman as his running mate won't win them over.

The selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, a pro-life, pro-gun conservative, was praised by social conservatives whose support McCain needs to defeat Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama.

Feminists quickly panned the selection Friday.

"I'm an active feminist. It will solidify me against McCain," said Phyllis Wetherby, 80, of Wilkinsburg. "It doesn't change my position toward McCain in the least."

Some voters said they aren't familiar with Palin, 44, a first-term governor and mother of five.

"I don't know anything about her. I'm a union member and definitely against McCain," said Dawn Jarocki of Greensburg, a pro-choice Obama supporter who voted for Clinton in the primary.

Former Clinton backer Jane Sheeder of State College is sticking with Obama.

"I know very little about (Palin)," she said.

Palin, a first-term governor with five children, follows in the footsteps of Geraldine Ferraro, who as Democrat Walter Mondale's vice presidential running mate in 1984 became the first woman to be placed on a major political party's national ticket.

"We should all be proud of Gov. Sarah Palin's historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain," Clinton said in a statement. "While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Gov. Palin will add an important new voice in the debate."

Betty Bull, 75, of Washington recalls the controversial Ferraro selection but still is surprised by the choice of Palin.

Bull, a Democrat, made up her mind early on to support McCain.

"I think he's the best qualified," she said.

Others thought the choice could hurt McCain's chances.

"I think he messed up. She needs to be home with her children," said Delores Burgess, 71, of Monessen, who is heeding Clinton's call to support Obama.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me