ShareThis Page
Home

Car collides with tractor-trailer

| Friday, Nov. 30, 2001

What is believed to be crack cocaine was found in what was left of a car that crossed the median of Interstate 279 and collided with a tractor trailer Thursday afternoon, police said.

The car was so mangled that the make and model could not be determined at first, police said.

The car's driver, Judith Graczyk, 38, of Pittsburgh had to be cut out of the vehicle, police said. She was in fair condition Thursday evening in Allegheny General Hospital, North Side, a hospital spokesman said.

The crash occurred at 12:20 p.m., near the West View-Bellevue exit of I-279.

According to Pennsylvania State Police, Graczyk drove onto the berm of the northbound lane of I-279, which caused her to lose control of her 1991 Toyota. Graczyk's car went through the median into the left lane of I-279 southbound, where it collided with a 1995 Freightliner tractor-trailer.

Truck driver Pedro Mayonada, 31, of Louisville, Ky., was not injured. Police said he was wearing his seatbelt.

According to the report, a material thought to be crack cocaine was found in Graczyk's vehicle. Charges could be filed, pending the analysis of blood and urine tests, police said.

Travel in the southbound lanes was restricted for more than three hours. Both the southbound and northbound lanes were open around 3:30 p.m.

As a result of the collision, the truck, which was towing an empty box trailer, jackknifed. The car ended up in the southbound lane.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me