ShareThis Page
Pennsylvania

State transportation funding studies continue

Tom Fontaine
| Wednesday, June 8, 2011

A commission established by Gov. Tom Corbett continues to seek ways to find up to $2.5 billion extra funding for the state's transportation needs.

The governor gave the Transportation Funding Advisory Commission until Aug. 1 to come up with proposals to generate $2 billion to $2.5 billion more to fix more roads and bridges and improve public transit and aviation. Pennsylvania is spending $6.3 billion on transportation this year.

Proposals discussed so far include eliminating safety inspections for new vehicles; increasing to eight years the period that driver's licenses are valid from four to cut down on administrative costs; and working with municipalities to reduce costs to maintain and operate traffic signals.

The commission also has discussed authorizing the creation of local tolling authorities that could impose tolls on local highways. The commission won't make recommendations on tolling specific routes.

"The (commission) is making great progress," PennDOT Secretary Barry Schoch said this morning in a statement.

A state study released last year said Pennsylvania needs another $3.5 billion a year to adequately address its transportation needs, but PennDOT spokesman Steve Chizmar said the commission appointed in April is "looking for short-term solutions to get to $2.5 billion and then work from there."

The commission has met three times since being created; two additional meetings are planned before Aug. 1. For more information, go to www.tfac.pa.gov/.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me