ShareThis Page
Home

Portion of Eliza Furnace rail trail to reopen

Bob Bauder
| Monday, Oct. 3, 2011

A detour will be lifted today on the Eliza Furnace rail trail, ending a 13-month, $5.2 million project to raise a problem railroad overpass over Bates Street in Hazelwood and widen the heavily traveled Bates Street approach to Second Avenue.

Joanna Doven, spokeswoman for Pittsburgh Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, said it will mark the third major infrastructure improvement completed by the city in the past year. The others have been street and lighting improvements at Fifth Avenue and Market Street, Downtown, and Penn Avenue in East Liberty near a new Target.

"This is a very big deal for the city. Thousands of commuters use that route every day," Doven said. "The mayor worked with the Federal Highway Commission and the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission to get this project off the ground and leverage this money."

Part of the 22-mile Three Rivers Heritage Trail that runs along Pittsburgh's riverfronts, the Eliza Trail begins Downtown and continues for about five miles to Hazelwood. Thomas Baxter, executive director of the nonprofit river advocacy group Friends of the Riverfront, said the trail was part of the defunct Baltimore and Ohio Railroad lines that once serviced Western Pennsylvania.

The trail remained open during construction, which began in August 2010 but was detoured along Second Avenue around the old B&O rail bridge.

The main focus of the project was raising the bridge, which had been a pinch point for trucks traveling Bates Street, one of the main access points into Oakland. The bridge was rebuilt, and Bates Street was widened from three lanes to five. Work also included landscaping around the bridge and an interpretive sign, explaining the historical significance of the B&O Railroad.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me