ShareThis Page

Cardinal notes that services brought enemies together

| Saturday, April 9, 2005

VATICAN CITY -- An American cardinal said Friday the unprecedented gathering of foreign delegates and religious leaders in Rome to mourn Pope John Paul II was one of the pontiff's final gifts to the world.

"Among the delegations were people who don't talk to each other, maybe fight with each other, but they were there because he drew them there," Washington Cardinal Theodore McCarrick said after the service. McCarrick is one of 11 American cardinals who will participate in the papal election, set to begin April 18.

It was a delicate atmosphere of forced smiles and slight acknowledgments as delegates from more than 80 countries, some of them not on speaking terms, sat in close proximity during the pontiff's three-hour, outdoor funeral Mass.

President Bush, who has referred to Iran as part of an "axis of evil" and whose administration is seeking to stem Tehran's nuclear program, sat not too far from Iranian President Mohammad Khatami. "Maybe today will make us hope of a future of peace, not of conflict and hatred," Khatami said in an interview in Corriere della Sera newspaper.

Israeli President Moshe Katsav said that, out of politeness, he shook hands with archenemies Khatami and Syrian President Bashar Assad.

There were no handshakes between British Prime Minister Tony Blair and Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe. Mugabe had accused Blair of meddling in African affairs and of attempting to derail Mugabe's recent re-election. Mugabe, however, did reach over and shake the hand of Prince Charles, which angered European politicians who have accused Zimbabwe's government of corruption and brutality.

Additional Information:

Remembering John Paul II - Photo gallery

click to view gallery View the photo gallery
The Associated Press

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me