ShareThis Page
Player's Advantage

Meadows casino unaffected by economic woes

| Friday, Sept. 26, 2008

Construction of The Meadows Racetrack and Casino in Washington County remains on track, even amid a credit crisis that scuttled plans for Valley View Downs in Lawrence County and nearly sank Pittsburgh's casino.

The Meadows' $175 million permanent casino -- at 350,000 square feet, more than four times larger than the temporary facility now operating -- is scheduled to open in spring.

Pittsburgh's casino is scheduled to open months later, in August.

"The Greater Pittsburgh region will be pleased with its first-ever, state-of-the-art permanent casino," said Mike Graninger, The Meadows' general manager.

The permanent facility is expected to be fully enclosed by the end of October, allowing workers to finish the interior during winter.

The Meadows wasn't hampered by the court challenges and community opposition to other casino projects in Pennsylvania. Since opening in 2007, it has silenced critics who worried it wouldn't make enough money to survive.

The temporary casino has turned a $60 million gross revenue this fiscal year, making it the third-most profitable of the state's seven operating casinos.

Owners of Valley View Downs announced last week that their $455 million financing package disintegrated. Chicago developer Neil Bluhm took over Pittsburgh's project this summer after lenders balked at former owner Don Barden's plans.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me