ShareThis Page
Nation

Extreme Associates to stand trial on obscenity charges

Jason Cato
| Wednesday, Oct. 8, 2008

A California couple accused of violating the nation's obscenity laws for running a company that made and distributed pornographic films depicting rape and murder will finally stand trial in Pittsburgh -- more than five years after being charged.

A federal grand jury indicted Robert Zicari and his wife, Janet Romano, in August 2003 and charged the couple with 10 counts of obscenity-related crimes. U.S. District Judge Gary L. Lancaster today scheduled a trial for March 16. Also charged is the couple's Los Angeles-based company, Extreme Associates.

In January 2005, Lancaster dismissed the charges against the company, Zicari and Romano, also known by the aliases "Rob Black" and "Lizzie Borden." The judge rejected the government's assertion that it has the right to restrict distribution of obscene materials to protect minors and those who do not want to be exposed to it.

U.S. Attorney Mary Beth Buchanan took the case to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which overturned Lancaster's decision in December 2005.

The case sat idle until Lancaster scheduled a status conference in August.

In 2002, an undercover U.S. Postal Service inspector bought pornographic videos through Extreme Associates' members-only Web site. Lancaster said technological devices can restrict access to Web sites and shield those who do not want to be exposed to such material.

The circuit court said the U.S. Supreme Court has decided that federal statutes regulating the distribution of obscene materials do not violate constitutional rights to privacy.

If convicted, Zicari and Romano could face up to 50 years in prison and a $2.5 million fine. Extreme Associates could be fined up to $5 million.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me