ShareThis Page

Baby boy leaps into Ravenstahls' lives

| Saturday, Nov. 1, 2008

Pittsburgh's first family welcomed an addition Friday.

Mayor Luke Ravenstahl's wife, Erin, gave birth to son Cooper Luke Ravenstahl, who weighed in at 7 pounds, 14 ounces and is 21 inches long.

"This is the happiest day of our lives," Ravenstahl said in a statement. "Both Erin and Cooper are healthy and doing great."

The mayor's office said the Ravenstahls, of Summer Hill, would not be immediately available for a photograph or interviews.

Cooper was immersed in his mother and father's political life just hours before Erin Ravenstahl went into labor early yesterday morning, said Councilman Jim Motznik.

The Ravenstahls, both 28, attended an annual political fundraiser that Motznik held at LeMont on Grandview Avenue in Mt. Washington -- the couple's favorite restaurant.

"We moved things along for them," said Motznik, who learned quickly how to balance politics and family life when his son, Jack, 7, was born shortly after he became a city councilman in 2001.

A Pittsburgh mayor with a newborn is a rarity. The last mayor with a newborn was Pete Flaherty, whose son, Greg, was born shortly after he won the mayoral primary in 1969.

The Ravenstahls kept the name of their son a secret until the birth. Social Security Administration records show the name Cooper has steadily climbed the charts from the 240th most popular in 2000 to the 95th most popular in 2007.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me