ShareThis Page

Man gets back wedding ring he lost in Welsh castle

| Friday, Dec. 25, 2009

Carl Mondy was on his way to buy a new wedding ring when the phone call came.

The one he lost at a Welsh castle had been found.

"We were literally two minutes away from buying a new ring," Mondy, 56, a global manager for oil and gas at North Fayette-based Industrial Scientific Corp., said Thursday from his home in Odessa, Texas.

The ring, which flew off Mondy's hand in September as he grabbed for his wind-blown hat while standing atop a tower at Caernarfon Castle in North Wales, was found by a woman from Australia before Thanksgiving, he said.

The ring has special meaning for Mondy and his wife Judy, who will celebrate their 35th wedding anniversary Jan. 4. It's the only wedding ring he has ever worn.

"It's pretty cool. An American ring, lost in a Welsh castle, was found by an Australian woman," said Mondy, who is on a temporary assignment in Wales until July. He came home to celebrate Christmas.

Australian Kelly Webb found the ring on an adjacent tower, said Mondy, who had no luck trying to find it the day he lost it.

"I heard it land off in the distance. ... I'm just glad someone did the right thing," he said.

He left his contact information at the castle, with the hope that the ring would turn up. But weeks passed, and he returned home for the holidays, thinking he would never see his ring again. The couple went to look for a replacement.

"The feel-good story is really about Kelly Webb. She was our Santa," said Mondy, who wrote a thank-you letter to Webb.

Caernarfon Castle, begun 1283, was constructed as a military stronghold, a seat of government and royal palace. The Mondys, who were together in Wales, toured the castle on a rainy day of sightseeing.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me