ShareThis Page

China gets warning on censorship

| Friday, Jan. 22, 2010

WASHINGTON -- In a new warning to China, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton called Thursday for free access to the Internet and said countries that attack information networks should face "consequences and international condemnation."

Citing growing censorship in China and other countries, Clinton said that "a new information curtain is descending over much of the world." She said the Obama administration would rally other world powers to try to reverse the trend, and urged private companies to resist censorship by foreign governments.

Clinton stopped short of detailing what approach the administration would use to pressure other governments or to expand Internet freedoms. She said governments and business first needed a "very vigorous discussion" of how to handle a complicated issue.

Her comments in Washington, which aides billed as major policy speech on Internet freedom, occurred as world attention has focused on Google's threat to pull out of China after cyberattacks on its networks, and intrusions into the e-mail accounts of political activists there. The controversy has built pressure on the Obama administration to explain how far it intends to go to defend U.S. interests and human rights.

U.S. officials have said they will soon demand a formal explanation of what happened to Google.

Chinese officials signaled again yesterday that they hoped to keep the dispute a commercial issue, rather than one with broader diplomatic implications.

Vice Foreign Minister He Yafei, speaking in Beijing, said that "the Google case should not be linked with relations between the two governments and countries. Otherwise, it's over-interpretation," he said, according to the official Xinhua news agency.

Clinton's speech occurs at a delicate moment in U.S.-Chinese relations. Frictions have grown over Obama's plans to sell arms to Taiwan and to meet with the Dalai Lama, and it is possible that the tensions could affect U.S. efforts to persuade China to join in a new round of U.N. sanctions against Iran over its nuclear ambitions.

Although Clinton did not spell out what sanctions the United States might use, Internet rights advocates and some other analysts described the speech as a commitment to a greater American role.

"It's a signpost that there's going to be a shift in policy," said Brett Solomon of, an advocate for Internet freedom. "We didn't get a detailed plan of action. But it's a commitment to a policy evolution."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me