ShareThis Page

Scottdale to eye budget trims this week

| Sunday, May 13, 2012, 3:58 a.m.

Faced with a revenue deficit, Scottdale Borough Council will meet this week to pare expenditures in the 2003 budget and try to avoid a property tax increase.

At Monday's meeting, council did not discuss the preliminary budget, adopted on Nov. 25, but learned from borough Manager Barry Whoric that the quote for the borough's insurance package was $16,000 to $20,000 less than budgeted in the preliminary spending plan.

Council accepted the $57,944 quote for an insurance package from DeFuri Mongell & Associates of Scottdale. Whoric said this year's insurance premium reflects almost a 15 percent increase from last year's package. However, Whoric is pleased with the quote in light of the fact that many municipalities saw 45 to 50 percent increases in costs or coverage was not renewed.

The preliminary budget estimates expenditures of $1.2 million and revenues of $1.05 million. Whoric said one unknown factor in the budget is the premium for workers' compensation. To reduce the $150,000 deficit in revenue, Whoric said council would have to look at capital projects and next year's paving projects. The borough did not have a paving project this year, and it is important to do the paving in 2003, he said.

A tax increase is council's decision, Whoric said. Last year, taxes increased by 1 mill to 17 mills; 1 mill generates $27,500 in revenue, he said.

In addition to Wednesday's budgeting session, Whoric anticipates another budget session will be held next week before the final adoption required by Dec. 31.

In other matters, council approved the proposal from Scottdale Bank & Trust for a $150,000 tax and revenue anticipation note at a fixed interest rate of 1.9 percent, or $2,865 in interest. Whoric said $4,000 had been budgeted for interest fees.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me