ShareThis Page

Grant to boost recycling in Jeannette

| Monday, May 14, 2012, 3:44 a.m.

With a controversial burning ban in place, Jeannette soon will receive a state grant to expand the city's recycling center and buy related equipment.

City Engineer Ed Antonacci said this week that the state Department of Environmental Protection has informed him a $372,000 grant for recycling needs is on its way.

To be eligible for the grant, the city had to have an ordinance prohibiting the burning of recyclable materials.

That ban, enacted in July, caused public outcry from some citizens who wanted to continue to burn paper products, leaves, other vegetation and certain recyclable materials.

In August, council considered rescinding the new ordinance but ultimately decided to keep it. With the law on the books, DEP awarded the grant, Antonacci said.

The city engineer said the money, less than the $560,000 grant applied for, will be used to expand the city's recycling center and to purchase a leaf vacuum and wood chipper, which the city will share with Penn Borough. Refurbishing a city truck that is used for recycling purposes also is expected to be funded through the grant.

"This is to the benefit of the city," Councilman Michael Cafasso said when discussing the grant and burning ban at council's regular meeting Wednesday.

Antonacci noted the vacuum and chipper should solve some problems for residents who opposed the new restrictions on burning of leaves, brush and tree limbs.

DEP also requires education programs about recycling as a condition to receive the money.

Antonacci was uncertain when the money would come to the city, but expected it to be soon.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me