ShareThis Page

Ex-Scout leader can't leave jail

Rich Cholodofsky
| Monday, May 14, 2012, 3:30 a.m.

A former Boy Scout leader convicted of conducting a bizarre bonding ritual with three young boys can't get out of jail because he has no place to live.

John Levendosky, 53, formerly of Derry, was in court Tuesday to ask Judge William J. Ober to change his sentence of nearly one to two years in jail.

Levendosky, 53, pleaded guilty in July to charges of child endangerment, unlawful restraint and other related offenses involving a June 2000 camping trip he took to Fairfield Township with three 13-year-old boys.

While in the woods, Levendosky made the boys perform a number of acts for entrance into his secret society. One of those acts included carving a letter into the boys' chests.

None of the charges against Levendosky were sexual in nature.

In August, after Levendosky had served more than 14 months in jail since his arrest a year earlier, Ober ordered that he be immediately paroled and serve the next six months on house arrest.

Seven months later Levendosky is still behind bars. Ryan Kammerer, assistant Westmoreland County public defender, said Levendosky has been unable to find a place to live because he cannot afford to pay rent and has no family nearby with whom he can stay.

In order to serve house arrest, Levendosky must have a verifiable address and phone number. Probation officials say he has neither.

As a result, Levendosky has served behind bars 21 months of his nearly two-year sentence. He also is required to serve 15 years' probation.

Ober declined to rule on Levendosky's request to have his sentenced altered.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me