ShareThis Page

Council studying traffic impact study bids

| Saturday, May 12, 2012, 4:24 a.m.

It's going to be three more weeks before Murrysville awards a contract for a traffic impact study.

Council decided Wednesday night it needed a little more time before the contract is awarded to either Trans Associates, of Pittsburgh, or the combination of URS, of Bridgeville, and McCormick, Taylor and Associates, of Pittsburgh.

Murrysville is looking to eventually adopt a transportation impact ordinance. Such an ordinance would assess a fee to developers for off-site improvements related to the traffic increase the development would cause.

Before such an ordinance can be approved, a traffic impact study must be undertaken.

The two organizations being considered by council each submitted a bid that surpassed the budgeted amount of $67,000 for the project.

URS/MTA's came in at $71,412, while Trans Associates was $74,200.

Council decided to give the companies until the next meeting -- scheduled for 7 p.m. Aug. 6 at the municipal building -- to make some revisions to their proposals.

There should be no changes in technical aspects, just in public input.

Many council members said they felt that was an area in which expenditures could be reduced.

"We're asking them to do everything that they were expected to do, but to cut down on meetings or other aspects involving public input," Councilman Robert Brooks said after the meeting.

It was the second consecutive meeting during which council has decided to wait before deciding to award the contract. Similar concerns were raised July 2 as to just how much public input is needed in a study council considers to be technical in nature.

Planning Director Fred Wilder said the project would take about six to nine months to complete. He also said he was aware of only two other municipalities in southwestern Pennsylvania that have a transportation impact fee in place -- Penn Township, and Cranberry Township, in Butler County.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me