ShareThis Page

Police officer retires, 2 in line for promotion

| Monday, May 14, 2012, 2:55 a.m.

Two Greensburg police officers are in line for promotions this month because a veteran police lieutenant retired last month.

City administrator Thomas Sphon said officials are interviewing two candidates for police lieutenant and more than 10 officers for the sergeant's position. Council may approve the promotions at its meeting Monday.

Lt. Ronald Waugaman, who served on the city police force for 31 years, retired Jan. 18., leaving the department with only two lieutenants - Walter Lyons and Dennis George.

Greensburg's contract with the Fraternal Order of Police General Greene Lodge No. 56 requires the city to promote from within, so the sergeant will come from the ranks of the patrolmen. Because the candidate for the lieutenant's position must hold the rank of at least a sergeant for one year, Waugaman's retirement also created the need for another sergeant.

Patrolmen seeking promotion to sergeant must have at least five years of service on the force. Police Chief Richard Baric said most of the patrolmen eligible for the promotion applied for the sergeant's post.

The city intends to hire another police officer to fill the slot left vacant by the promotion of a patrolman to sergeant. Baric said the hiring probably will not occur until May because of the hiring must follow the Civil Service procedures.

The Greensburg Civil Service Commission will conduct an examination to develop a new list of candidates for police jobs because the current list is two years old, Sphon said. Applicants must be at least 21 years old and have completed at least 60 college credits in a program with major emphasis on criminology, law enforcement, corrections or a similar field.

Applications are available weekdays until 4 p.m. Feb. 15 at the police department in City Hall. The city's Civil Service Commission will administer the exam 9 a.m. March 9 at Greensburg Salem High School.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me