ShareThis Page
News

Commissioners OK more funds for ventilation work

| Thursday, May 10, 2012, 5:39 a.m.

North Huntingdon Township will spend an extra $4,715 to fix ventilation problems in the police department that date to the original heating and cooling system installed in the Town House more than 30 years ago.

The custom-designed British system called for venting lead residue from the police department's shooting range into the rest of the building, police Chief Charles Henaghan said.

It also made no provisions for venting the evidence room, where odors from modern-day contraband build up.

But those aren't the only oddities of the system, Henaghan said. Workers removing the ducts from the old system as part of a $460,000 replacement project found the insulation was inside the ductwork, he said.

Township commissioners last night approved the change order to vent the shooting range and the evidence room. Over the years, the township had jerry-rigged a ventilation system to remove the lead and contraband odors.

Work on the ductwork of the new system is complete and the installation of air handlers has begun, township engineer Jeff Bradshaw said. The project is expected to be completed by mid-October.

In other business, the commissioners agreed to keep open a public hearing on the planned demolition of a home where dozens of cats were confiscated earlier this summer.

Humane officers found nearly 100 cats at the Joan Drive home of Jean Urquhart, 71, in July. Many were dead. The stench was so intense, the officers could stay inside only for 15-minute intervals.

Cat feces in the house was 4 to 5 inches deep, the agents said.

The homeowner hopes to secure a contract to replace the walls and floorboards in the home that were ruined by the felines. The commissioners agreed to give her the opportunity to repair the house.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me