ShareThis Page

Fayette County man, son plead guilty in ATM theft

| Monday, May 14, 2012, 2:12 p.m.

A Fayette County father and son pleaded guilty Monday to charges stemming from the theft of an automated teller machine in 1997.

Thomas W. Rice Sr., 59, and Thomas W. Rice Jr., 28, both of Farmington RD1, entered their pleas before U.S. District Judge Donald Ziegler in Pittsburgh.

The elder Rice pleaded guilty to a charge of using a dangerous device during a bank theft, and the younger Rice pleaded guilty to charges of conspiracy and bank larceny, according to U.S. Attorney Harry Litman.

Authorities said the two and at least one other person stole a tiltbed truck in Uniontown, drove it to the First Philson Bank in Indian Head and then took the ATM from the drive-through area of that bank.

While making their getaway, the Rices used the elder Rice's pickup truck to force the vehicles of two witnesses off the road, officials said.

The machine was found buried in a wooded area known as 'the Glade,' which is near the Rices' residence. The FBI and state police used a backhoe to dig up the ATM.

Authorities said that before burying the machine, the Rices split it open and removed approximately $10,900.

The elder Rice is scheduled to be sentenced on July 13, and the younger Rice is to be sentenced on July 20.

The elder Rice faces up to 25 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The younger Rice faces up to 15 years in prison and a $500,000 fine.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me