ShareThis Page

Court: Dry-cleaning bag OK as evidence in Long case

| Monday, May 14, 2012, 7:22 a.m.

A dry-cleaning bag that police claim Dr. Karl Long used to suffocate his wife can be shown to a jury after an appeals court ruled that a judge erred when excluding it from evidence.

In an opinion filed Thursday the state's Superior Court ruled that Westmoreland County Judge William J. Ober misinterpreted the rules regulating police obtaining search warrants when he said a police officer couldn't swear to an affidavit over a videoconference telephone call.

'I'm very grateful for the Superior Court's decision,' District Attorney John Peck said last night. Defense attorney William McCabe could not be reached for comment.

Long, 42, of Ligonier, was charged with criminal homicide in connection with the Oct. 3, 1999, suffocation death of his wife, Elaine Long, in their home. Police were called to the home in response to a domestic disturbance to find the two lying on their bed. Elaine Long was dead and had a dry-cleaning bag over her head, and Karl Long had a stab wound to his chest.

Long told police he acted in self-defense to fend off an attack by his knife-wielding wife. Police claim Long suffocated his wife with the bag and stabbed himself, creating a shallow wound.

Police say they found Long's fingerprints on the dry-cleaning bag.

During the initial investigation, Ligonier police Officer Robert E. Derk requested permission from a district justice to search the Long residence.

Derk faxed an affidavit of probable cause to District Justice Joseph Dalfonso in Night Court at the county prison and swore to its contents in a videoconference. During a hearing, Dalfonso testified he recognized Derk as a police officer.

Ober ruled that evidence collected in the search had to be excluded from trial because the rules required the police officer to be in the physical presence of the district justice to take the oath.

'The administration of an oath and the swearing before a judicial authority are acts at the very foundation of jurisprudence. These are not a matter of ceremony or mere formality for which a substitute procedure will suffice,' Ober wrote in suppressing the evidence.

Judge Richard Joseph Del Sole, writing for the panel of three Superior Court judges, disagreed.

'The rule itself makes no mention that the affidavit must be sworn to in the physical presence of the (district justice) and we decline to read this requirement into the rules,' it read in part.

'It must be acknowledged that we live in an age of technology ... It is likely that the procedure for taking an oath and swearing to affidavits over the phone for purposes of obtaining search warrants will become more and more commonplace,' Del Sole wrote.

Shortly after the prosecutors took their appeal to Superior Court, Ober released Long on a $200,000 property bond after he spent a year in jail. He treats patients at his Greensburg podiatry office and lives under house arrest with his parents. He periodically sees his two young children.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me