ShareThis Page
News

Walton homicide trial to resume Monday

Rich Cholodofsky
| Monday, May 14, 2012, 4:51 p.m.

The murder trial of accused killer Terry L. Walton is scheduled to reconvene Monday morning.

Testimony in the nonjury trial before Westmoreland County Judge John Blahovec was slated to resume Friday after more than a week hiatus, but a scheduling conflict with a witness pushed back the restart date to next week.

Walton, 45, of 416 Harrison Ave., Greensburg, is accused of shooting his estranged girlfriend, Philomena Rulli Robinson, 42, in the head on Dec. 29, 1998. Walton is charged with first-degree murder and faces a mandatory life prison sentence if he is convicted of that offense.

Prosecutors contend Walton, a star basketball player at Greensburg Salem High School in the early 1970s, went to Robinson's apartment to shoot her after she rebuffed his attempts at a reconciliation.

Walton testified last week that he went to Robinson's home at the Rosewood Apartments in Greensburg with the intent to commit suicide in front of her. Walton said he accidentally shot Robinson as she tried to run away from him.

Walton said he had actually aimed the gun at her car and not at her head, where she was struck with one round from his semiautomatic revolver.

The trial was stopped last week when defense attorneys tried to introduce evidence that Walton was too depressed to form an intent to kill.

Blahovec postponed the trial to allow prosecutors time to prepare for that testimony.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me