ShareThis Page

Doctor fined for ethical violation in Turner case

| Saturday, May 5, 2012, 12:52 a.m.

A Canadian psychiatrist was fined $10,000 Friday after he was found guilty of professional misconduct involving the late Dr. Shirley Turner, who was wanted in Pennsylvania for killing a Latrobe Area Hospital physician in 2001.

Dr. John Doucet, of Newfoundland, also was ordered to undergo psychiatric counseling by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Newfoundland and Labrador.

The peer group ruled he violated doctor-patient ethics by posting Turner's $65,000 bail at the time he was treating her as a patient.

Rather than return to Westmoreland County to face trial for the murder of Dr. Andrew Bagby, Turner plunged into the ocean, drowning herself and her 13-month-old son, Zachary Bagby. Andrew Bagby was Turner's boyfriend at one time and Zachary's father.

Turner had waged a legal battle to avoid extradition and was facing imminent deportation when she killed herself and her son.

Kathleen Bagby, of Sunnyvale, Calif., said Friday that she and her husband, David, are pleased with the decision.

"All we wanted was a statement that this was wrong," she said. "It should be obvious to most professionals that this was wrong. I see him as very much responsible for my grandchild's death."

Doucet was found guilty of misconduct last month after the College of Physicians and Surgeons ruled that he should not have posted her bail while he was treating Turner. He saw her 21 times, according to news accounts.

After Pennsylvania State Police issued a warrant for Turner's arrest, she fled to Newfoundland where she held citizenship. She had been practicing medicine in Iowa and had returned from a visit with Bagby when she was charged with shooting him five times at Keystone State Park in Derry Township.

By tracing cell phone records between Pennsylvania and Iowa, investigators determined that after visiting Bagby, Turner flew back to Iowa and then immediately returned to Latrobe to confront him over problems in their relationship.

In 2002, the Newfoundland Supreme Court ordered Turner extradited, but she was released on bail pending further appeals. Before she was placed on bail, she had begun seeing Doucet as a patient and complained that while she was in jail could not see her son and could not find anyone else willing to post her bail.

The College of Physicians and Surgeons said Doucet's action to post her bail constituted a violation of the doctor-patient relationship.

Doucet said at a hearing that he had known Turner since she was a medical student and he "acted out of a genuine concern for my patient's well-being, which was my only motive," according to the Canadian Press Association.

Doucet told the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. he was "disappointed in the decision (and) the verdict."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me