ShareThis Page

Salem Township may raise sewage rates

| Friday, May 4, 2012, 2:19 a.m.

Salem Township supervisors have presented a preliminary budget for 2007 that would not require a tax increase, but would include a hike in sewage rates.

A proposed 2007 spending plan, approved by unanimous vote, projects revenues at $1,243,500 and expenditures at $1,235,513. Real estate taxes would remain at 6 mills.

Supervisor Ron Martz said the current $32 monthly sewage rate would increase to $40.

He attributed a few factors to the need for the rate hike. These include two major breaks in lines -- one under Route 22 near the GetGo and another in the force main under Route 66 at the Clover Leaf pump station.

Those projects combined to nearly drain a sewage maintenance account that had about $400,000.

Salem Township will incur additional expenses as a result of the BO2 section of the Route 22 reconstruction project and a $2 monthly increase in Franklin Township Municipal Sanitary Authority rates.

"It just took a tremendous amount of money," Martz said. "There were major problems and we spent hundreds of thousands of dollars (to fix). Those projects just ate it."

Supervisors plan to approve a final 2007 budget when they meet Dec. 21.

"Somehow, we're going to struggle through next year," Martz said.

The last tax increase approved by the board was a 1-mill hike in 2002 for the 2003 spending plan.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me