ShareThis Page

Rose avoids jail for luring

Rich Cholodofsky
| Friday, May 4, 2012, 12:16 a.m.

Former Washington Observer-Reporter sports editor Thomas Rose Wednesday avoided jail for trying to lure a child over the Internet, even as state prosecutors argued that he posed a threat to children.

Rose, 52, of Delmont, was sentenced to serve four years' probation for a misdemeanor conviction of attempting to lure a child, a misdemeanor offense.

A state agent, posing as a 12-year-old named "Jessica," had numerous online chats with Rose for about a week in September 2005. Rose attempted to meet the would-be teen at an area McDonald's restaurant when he was arrested.

During a jury trial in September, Rose testified he thought he was chatting with an adult female.

In court yesterday, Rose pleaded with the judge for probation, instead of a prison term. Rose said he suffered from a sexual addiction and that his crime had already cost him his marriage, house, job and reputation.

"I couldn't tell you when this addiction began," Rose said. "I feel foolish I didn't have the mental strength to recognize this and stop myself."

Rose faced a maximum sentence of five years' imprisonment, and prosecutors wanted Westmoreland County Judge Richard E. McCormick Jr. to impose a penalty that included jail time.

Senior Deputy Attorney General Anthony Forray said Rose's actions and a previous incident, during which he had contact with a 16-year-old girl he had met over the Internet, indicated that jail time was warranted.

Forray said he was disappointed with the judge's sentence.

"I don't think addiction is a defense for a criminal activity," Forray said. "We believe Mr. Rose is a danger to children of the commonwealth."

In court, McCormick said he imposed a sentence within the standard range of sentencing guidelines, which took into account punishment and rehabilitation requirements.

Rose, who works for a Greensburg attorney, was barred from having any unsupervised contact with children and ordered to not use any computer or other equipment with Internet access for social purposes.

Rose was declared a sex offender under Megan's Law and was ordered to register his address with the state police for 10 years.

Both defense attorneys and prosecutors indicated yesterday that appeals might be forthcoming.

Forray hinted that prosecutors were still unhappy that McCormick had downgraded the charges against Rose from a felony to a misdemeanor during the trial. In addition, McCormick threw out the jury's guilty verdict to a second felony charge of unlawful contact by use of a communications device. The judge said jurors did not follow his instructions that required they acquit Rose on that count if they found him guilty of a lesser charge of attempting to lure a child into having indecent assault.

Defense attorney Robert Brady said Rose intends to appeal the conviction, saying the charged offense was unconstitutional. At trial, Brady argued Rose fell victim to illegal entrapment and was improperly targeted in an adult chat room where sexual fantasies were exchanged.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me