ShareThis Page
News

Regola might ask for trial to move

Rich Cholodofsky
| Thursday, May 3, 2012, 5:03 p.m.

State Sen. Robert Regola is considering asking for a jury from outside Westmoreland County to decide his fate on perjury and firearms charges.

Defense attorney Duke George said Monday the freshman Republican senator from Hempfield will file a series of motions in a month challenging the criminal charges filed in the aftermath of the fatal self-inflicted shooting this past summer of Regola's 14-year-old neighbor.

On Friday, Regola formally waived his right to appear in court June 29 for an arraignment. Regola submitted paperwork in which he pleaded not guilty to the charges against him and asked for a jury trial.

Regola, 44, is charged with three felony counts of perjury, allowing his teenage son access to a firearm, reckless endangerment and making false statements under oath. Authorities contend Regola's 9 mm Taurus semiautomatic was used in the suicide last summer of Louis Farrell.

Farrell's body was discovered July 23 in the woods behind his home with a gunshot wound to the head. The boy had access to the Regola house a day earlier to walk the family's dogs.

The shooting and subsequent arrest of Regola and his son gained instant attention.

"With the jury pool we have we have to make a determination if we can get a fair and impartial jury in Westmoreland County because of all the publicity. The biggest problem is whether we can get a fair and impartial jury," George said.

In addition to a potential change of venue motion, the defense will ask a county judge to throw out the case against Regola, saying there is not enough evidence to warrant those charges.

George said that motion should be filed in about a month.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me