ShareThis Page

Progress reported in teacher negotiations

| Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 6:59 p.m.

Greensburg Salem's school board president and the chief negotiator for the teachers union emerged from a 6 1/2-hour session Saturday reporting progress in contract talks.

Board president Trudy Ivory and Matt King, president of the Greensburg Salem Education Association, said the next meeting, slated for Nov. 29, would be important.

The district's approximately 200 teachers have been without a contract since June 30. They have been working under terms of the expired agreement.

Wages and medical insurance are not resolved.

"They were good. We're good," Ivory said of yesterday's talks as she stepped out of the senior high school.

"We'll come up with a solution, I hope. I see no reason why we can't. We're good. We really are."

King said he is optimistic, but added that details remain to be worked out. He declined to elaborate.

"We still have got numbers to crunch, both sides," he said.

Of the next meeting, King said, "Hopefully, that's the end."

As he left the high school, Director Lee Kunkle would only say when the next meeting is scheduled.

In addition to Ivory and Kunkle, Director Barbara Hinkle and chief negotiator Bill Andrews of the Andrews and Price law firm in Pittsburgh have represented the district at the talks.

A Pennsylvania State Education Association representative, King and other members of the local union's bargaining team have been involved in the discussions. A state mediator has attended.

At a session Nov. 6, teachers presented a proposal to the district over the unresolved wage and health care issues. Earlier this month, King said directors were to get back to him at yesterday's meeting with their views on that proposal.

It could not be determined what role that proposal may have had on the discussions.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me