ShareThis Page

Animal activists hold vigil ahead of North Huntingdon goose hunts

| Wednesday, May 2, 2012, 6:01 p.m.

An animal activist group held a candlelight vigil Sunday in North Huntingdon to protest four planned Canada goose hunts scheduled to begin today at Indian Lake.

The 5 p.m. vigil at the Town House on Center Highway was organized after several concerned local residents contacted Voices for Animals of Western Pennsylvania, an all-volunteer group which last summer led a similar campaign against goose hunts carried out at North Park in Allegheny County. The shoots at Indian Lake are scheduled for today, Dec. 12, Dec. 17 and Dec. 19.

Group officials such as spokesperson Lindsay Zurosky recently wrote township Manager Kelly Wolfe to recommend the humane, non-lethal integrated goose management policy promoted by GeesePeace, an organization that has managed sites frequented by Canada geese.

"These shoots have nothing to do with goose control, or with sport. These are basically canned hunts, firing at semi-tame birds who have learned not to fear humans and are therefore an easy target," Zurosky said.

Wolfe was unavailable Sunday for comment. Township police Lt. Rod Mahinske said yesterday that the vigil was permissible.

"That's their right, as long as they don't screw up the property or anything, it's no big deal to us," Mahinske said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me