ShareThis Page
News

Greensburg to receive traffic signals upgrade

| Saturday, June 16, 2012, 7:37 p.m.

New traffic signals are planned for four intersections in Greensburg.

City council this week entered into right-of-way agreements for some of those lights.

City Administrator Sue Trout said the signals will replace existing ones and should be brighter and more energy-efficient.

The signals are planned where West Pittsburgh Street intersects with Washington Avenue, Spring Street and Bell Way. The last involved intersection is at West Newton and Spring streets.

The old signals have become obsolete, Trout said.

Sean Sepe, PennDOT project manager, said the lights are part of 10 traffic signals proposed for this year in Westmoreland County. The other lights will be located in Hempfield, Rostraver, Monessen, Youngstown, Derry Township and Jeannette.

Bids for the work are to be opened Thursday.

Council also agreed to buy a four-wheel-drive tractor and a rough unit mower for the Mt. Odin Golf Course. Finance agreements for the purchases were approved.

The mower will cost $44,958 from E.H. Griffith Inc., Pittsburgh, and council approved a five-year lease with annual payments of $9,817 with Catalyst Capital Corp.

The tractor will cost $27,800 from Maple Mountain Equipment, Somerset, and council endorsed a five-year lease with five annual payments of $6,070, also with Catalyst.

Trout said the pieces of equipment are replacements and were earmarked in the 2008 city budget.

On Trout's advice, council rejected a lone bid entered by Smeltzer Construction, Apollo, for purchase of a reflective ceiling for the Kirk S. Nevin Arena at Lynch Field.

Trout asked the panel to reject Smeltzer's cost of $46,780 because she said city officials discovered recently that grant funding may be available for the work.

The bid amount was more than the $30,000 budgeted for the project, she said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me