ShareThis Page

Ligonier meat bandit gets 13 to 26 months

| Sunday, June 17, 2012, 11:20 p.m.

Ligonier police didn't need a stake out -- they just grilled the getaway driver as they looked for a meat bandit last year.

Penn Hills resident Frederick Anderson Wyble, 50, pleaded guilty Thursday to two counts of robbery and a charge of retail theft in connection with the Sept. 12, 2007, heist $150 of filets and other meats at the Ligonier Giant Eagle.

Wyble was sentenced yesterday by Westmoreland County Judge Rita Hathaway to serve 13 to 26 months in jail.

According to court records, Wyble was spotted stealing the meat by a store clerk, shoved her as he fled and jumped into the passenger side of a waiting white van.

The driver of that van, Daniel Cicco of Penn Hills, is a painting contractor who hired Wyble for a job in Rector. Wyble asked Cicco to stop at the Giant Eagle to buy cigarettes, but apparently had other ideas.

When questioned by police, Cicco said he saw the beef between Wyble and the store clerk, and left in a panic when Wyble returned to the vehicle holding packages of meat, according to court documents.

The clerk was able to give the van's license plate number to authorities. The van driver was interviewed by police two weeks later and identified Wyble as the meat thief.

Wyble was later picked out of a photo lineup by the store clerk.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me