ShareThis Page

Derry Township man's estate files wrongful death suit against father

Rich Cholodofsky
| Saturday, April 28, 2012, 5:29 a.m.

The estate of a Derry Township man killed by a falling tree in February has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the dead man's father.

Brian Shean Sr., 37, was killed Feb. 9 after he and his father went to assist Mark Plachta, who was trying to take down a tree on the property of the victim's mother-in-law.

Shean family lawyer Jason Hines said Plachta was attempting to harvest the tree for firewood when he starting having difficulty.

According to the lawsuit, Shean and his father, Terry, came to help so the tree would not strike the mobile home of Dorthea Platt, Brian Shean's mother-in-law.

As the men worked, the tree broke free and fell to the ground. Brian Shean pushed his father out of the way and was then struck by the tree, the suit said.

Terry Shean and Plachta tried unsuccessfully to free Brian Shean from under the fallen tree.

In the lawsuit, Brian Shean's wife, Jennifer, representing her husband's estate, claimed, "Brian Shean Sr. suffered great pain and suffering and was killed as a direct and proximate result of negligence, carelessness and recklessness of defendant Terry Shean."

Hines said Monday that the lawsuit was only a means to ensure the future of the Sheans' son, Brian Jr.

"The heirs of the estate have to sue the responsible parties. I have to pursue this for a 4-year-old boy," Hines said.

The five-count lawsuit seeks an unspecified damages from Plachta and Terry Shean.

A woman who identified herself over the telephone as Plachta's wife yesterday said her husband would refuse to comment about the lawsuit.

Terry Shean could not be reached for comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me