ShareThis Page

West Newton bank robbery suspect indicted

| Thursday, April 26, 2012, 11:50 p.m.

A West Newton man has been indicted for a December bank robbery that netted nearly $5,000, most of which later was mailed back to the bank.

Mark Zabielski was indicted in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh for the Dec. 9 robbery of the PNC bank on East Main Street in West Newton.

According to a five-page indictment, Zabielski, 33, walked into the bank and gave a teller a note demanding $10,000. The teller, who misunderstood Zabielski and thought he wanted to withdraw money from his account, told FBI investigators Zabielski replied: "You don't understand, I need the money now. You have two minutes."

The teller said Zabielski left the bank after he was handed $4,767 from a cash drawer.

Three days after the robbery, the West Newton Post Office received a "suspicious package" and turned it over to police, who said it contained $3,790 in cash, $977 less than what was taken in the robbery.

A witness who knows Zabielski identified him from a bank security video image taken during the robbery and contacted the FBI.

According to the indictment, filed earlier this month, a witness said Zabielski -- who lives a block from the bank -- confessed to the crime. The witness said Zabielski admitted making little attempt to disguise his identity and did not think he would be recognized because he "used make-up on his face, shaved and squinted to look angry."

West Newton police Chief Gary Indolf said Zabielski denied being involved in the robbery, telling him during an interview that he was "decorating his house for Christmas" during the time of the heist and that he even offered to take a polygraph test.

Zabielski is free on $50,000 unsecured bond while awaiting trial on the robbery charge.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me