ShareThis Page
News

Police use Taser on motorist angered by speeding ticket

Paul Peirce
| Thursday, April 26, 2012, 1:01 a.m.

A Greensburg man traveling 11 miles over the speed limit Friday in South Greensburg had to be subdued with a Taser after he became angered about getting a ticket, police said.

Jacob Colombin, 24, of 120 N. Lincoln Ave. is being held in the Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of a $50,000 bond.

Colombin was subdued by Greensburg and South Greensburg police officers after fleeing a traffic stop on Highland Avenue about 10 p.m. Friday, police said.

Colombin is charged with aggravated assault, criminal mischief, disorderly conduct, escape, reckless driving, driving on the wrong side of the roadway, resisting arrest and simple assault by South Greensburg Patrolman Joseph C. Lewis.

Lewis pulled Colombin over for traveling 36 mph in a 25-mph zone, according to court documents.

Colombin became angry and told Lewis he didn't have his insurance card with him, but "If I did, you wouldn't get it," Lewis said.

After Lewis wrote the speeding ticket, Colombin signed the citation and returned the officer's pen.

"Why don't you go arrest a real (expletive) criminal?" Colombin allegedly told Lewis before throwing the officer's clipboard at him and speeding off without returning a copy of the citation.

Lewis chased Colombin through the borough and into Greensburg. As Colombin drove the wrong way on Euclid Avenue Extension, several Greensburg police units joined the pursuit.

When Colombin was blocked by several police cars, he attempted to flee by jumping on the hood of one of the vehicles, police said. One of the officers used a Taser gun to subdue him.

He was placed in a police car and then attempted to kick out the vehicle's back window, police said.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled June 15 before Youngwood District Judge James Falcon.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me