ShareThis Page

Hempfield teachers reject retirement incentive plan

| Sunday, May 13, 2012, 10:51 p.m.

Most of the Hempfield Area School District teachers who were eligible for a retirement incentive plan offered through the district last month have turned down the offer.

Only one of 12 teachers who qualified for the program expressed an interest, said Superintendent Dr. Wayne Doyle. Because the district wanted the participation of at least 10 teachers who had not previously announced they would retire, the plan will not be implemented.

"It has to financially make sense, and it simply did not," Doyle said.

Eligible teachers would have had their current dental, vision and life insurance premiums paid until age 65. Without the incentive, retirees have only their health insurance premiums paid until age 65.

They also would have been paid $25 for each unused sick day.

The plan was designed as a cost-saving measure aimed at replacing longtime teachers at the top of the salary scale with new hires. Teachers had until May 1 to submit their written resignations in order to participate.

Although the incentive plan failed with the teachers, the school board now is offering the same deal to secretarial and clerical employees.

Eligible employees have until May 28 to take advantage of the offer. The participation of at least five employees who have not already announced plans to retire is needed.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me