ShareThis Page

Thirty-one volunteers honored for work with inmates

| Wednesday, April 25, 2012, 8:50 p.m.

The state Department of Corrections last week recognized the contributions of 31 volunteers during the agency's annual banquet for those who helped to meet prison inmates' educational, health and spiritual needs.

"Volunteers provide valuable services to our inmates, services that the department otherwise would not be able to provide," said acting Corrections Secretary Shirley Moore Smeal. "Through their interaction, they help inmates better relate to society and experience personal growth and positive change."

Among the volunteers honored were:

• Simeon Hatcher has ministered to inmates in State Correctional Institution-Fayette for six years.

• John Spardo leads Narcotics Anonymous groups for inmates and began volunteering in SCI-Greene in 2008.

• George W. Wigfield has led the Prison Outreach Program in SCI-Greensburg since the early 1980s.

• Sharon Fox has led Bible studies in SCI-Laurel Highlands in Somerset County since 2005.

• George Hinson has directed the Rite of Christian Initiation of Adults program in SCI-Pine Grove, Indiana County, since 2001.

• Doris Lambert leads a grief and loss group for inmates in SCI-Somerset.

Volunteers were presented with an attache bag and a framed letter signed by Gov. Ed Rendell and Smeal, who served as keynote speaker at the banquet in Elizabethtown.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me