ShareThis Page

Florida man sentenced

Rich Cholodofsky
| Sunday, May 13, 2012, 10:29 p.m.

Walter Hodges II came to Pennsylvania a year ago from Florida to meet and stay with a Penn Borough woman he first came into contact with over the Internet.

Now Hodges, 22, will call a state prison home for at least the next seven years after being sentenced Tuesday for having sexual relations with two young friends of his computer pen pal.

Westmoreland County Judge Debra Pezze sentenced Hodges yesterday to serve seven to 14 years in prison and six years on probation. Hodges pleaded guilty in February to most of the charges against him.

Pezze yesterday dismissed nine counts of rape filed against Hodges. The judge also ruled that Hodges was a sex offender under the state's Megan's Law, requiring that he register his address with state police once he is freed from prison.

Penn Township police accused Hodges of having sex at least three times last June with a 15-year-old and 12-year-old girl.

He met the girls through the unidentified woman's daughter. Hodges and the woman chatted over the Internet for about three months before Hodges came from Florida to stay with her, police said.

Authorities said Hodges had been in Pennsylvania for more than a month before starting sexual relationships with the young girls. Police claimed Hodges took the girls to a wooded section of the township where he forced them to have sex with him.

Hodges is not related to the victims or the woman, police said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me