ShareThis Page
News

Greensburg police chief Lyons gets three-year contract

| Sunday, June 10, 2012, 2:47 p.m.

In a 4-1 vote yesterday, Greensburg City Council awarded a new three-year contract to police Chief Walter "Wally" Lyons.

Councilwoman Kathleen McCormick, who cast the lone dissenting vote last night, said she opposes Lyons receiving a take-home car. She said the vehicle is a "burden to the taxpayers," who have to pay for the vehicle, gasoline and insurance.

Mayor Karl Eisaman replied that many communities in Westmoreland County supply their police chiefs with a vehicle. He had a list of nine communities that supply a car, including Penn and Rostraver townships, Monessen, Murrysville and New Kensington.

Other council members maintain the chief needs a take-home car to get to a crime scene quickly.

McCormick said Lyons could use his personal vehicle and be reimbursed work mileage.

Eisaman said that if the car was taken from Lyons, the city would add it to the police fleet, and residents would still have to pay for gasoline and insurance.

"The chief's car could be sold," McCormick replied.

In addition to the chief, three other officers in the police department have take-home vehicles: two detectives and the canine officer.

Lyons noted after the meeting that the four vehicles were purchased through grant funds.

"It allows for quicker response to emergency calls," he added.

Under the deal, which begins next month, Lyons will receive a salary of $80,470 for 2011. He receives an additional $16,100 as longevity pay for his years of service. His rate in the remaining years of the pact are the same as what officers receive under their union contract, plus longevity pay.

Lyons has been with the police department for 38 years and has been chief since 2003.

Council members agreed to a five-year lease agreement to buy a new truck for Rick Hoyle, road superintendent, for $31,700.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me