ShareThis Page

Two Greensburg brothers charged with witness intimidation

| Sunday, June 10, 2012, 1:45 p.m.

Two Greensburg brothers are charged with using threats to try to persuade an alleged victim in another case not to testify against one of the brothers.

Edward Bates, 38, and Jack Bates, 37, both of 511 Sells Lane, were arraigned Sunday before North Huntingdon District Judge Douglas Weimer on a charge of intimidation of a victim or witness.

Greensburg police allege the two called a 37-year-old woman Feb. 13 and threatened her if she testified against Jack Bates in a case filed Jan. 27.

In that case, Bates was charged with aggravated assault and other offenses after Greensburg police said he assaulted the woman and started strangling her.

Police took the two men into custody on arrest warrants after authorities responded to a disturbance at the brothers' home Saturday, Greensburg police Capt. George Seranko said.

Jack Bates was jailed in lieu of posting $50,000 bond. His brother was unable to post $5,000 bond, according to court records.

They face preliminary hearings before Greensburg District Judge James Albert.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me