ShareThis Page

1 incumbent survives in crowded Southmoreland School Board race

| Wednesday, May 18, 2011

Only one incumbent on the Southmoreland School Board, Mike Bentz, will make it onto the ballot in November's general election.

Ten candidates were vying for five open seats in Tuesday's primary.

With 100 percent of the vote in, winning the nominations on the Republican ticket were James Beistel, Aimee Love, Jason Pawlikowsky, Ken Alt and Bentz.

Receiving the Democratic nominations were Pawlikowsky, Beistel, Love, Bentz and Alt.

The school district straddles Westmoreland and Fayette counties.

In Westmoreland County on the Republican, ticket Beistel received 13 percent of the vote; followed by Love with 13 percent; Pawlikowsky, 12 percent; Alt, 10 percent; and Bentz, 10 percent.

On the Democratic ticket, Pawlikowsky lead with 14 percent; followed by Beistel with 13.9 percent; Love, 13 percent; Bentz, 11 percent; and incumbent Samuel J. Accipiter Jr., 10 percent.

In Fayette on the Republican side, Love was the top vote-getter with 13 percent, followed by Beistel, Alt, and Pawikowsky, all with 11 percent; and Alverda F. Clawson, 10 percent.

On the Democratic side, Pawlikowsky and Love each received 14 percent of the vote; Bentz, 12 percent; and Beistel and Alt, 11 percent.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me