ShareThis Page

Former trooper from Hempfield gets jail in feud

Rich Cholodofsky
| Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 9:12 a.m.

A fired state police trooper will spend a week in jail for assaulting his next-door neighbor last year.

Christopher Miller, 42, of Hempfield was sentenced on Monday to serve seven days to 23 months behind bars in what Westmoreland County Judge Al Bell called an effort to stem an escalating neighborhood feud that he said might lead to more violence against next-door neighbor Terrence Hurd, 73.

"There is undue risk that you will commit another crime and a strong propensity to visit violence on Mr. Hurd," Bell said. "I've tried everything I can think of to keep this from escalating."

Bell ordered Miller to report to jail on Nov. 28 and said he intended to parole him immediately after a week.

For five years the Millers and Hurds were friendly neighbors.

In court yesterday, both Terrence Hurd and Miller said the origins of their feud involved each other's barking dogs that defecated in their neighbor's yards.

After a jury trial in September, Miller was convicted of a misdemeanor count of simple assault for pushing Hurd to the ground during a videotaped confrontation on June 17, 2010, in the front yard of the victim's Mohican Drive home.

Two times before the trial Miller appeared before judges after Hurd and his wife complained they were harassed by their neighbor. In court yesterday, the Hurds presented more videos and pictures that depicted Miller this month shining a flashlight into their windows late at night and just this past weekend approach them at a wooden fence that separated the properties.

Bell, frustrated by the ongoing behavior of both Miller and the Hurds, who erected four security cameras and numerous motion lights that shine toward their neighbor's home, chastised both parties after the sentencing hearing.

The judge compared the dispute to a Cold War Germany and the fence to the Berlin Wall.

"We're just getting to the point of absolute ridiculousness. What's it going to take for everybody to grow up in this case?" Bell asked. "This keeps going on and on and on. Somebody's going to end up dead."

Miller, an 11-year veteran of the state police, had been suspended, pending the outcome of his trial. Defense attorney Pat Thomassey said Miller has since been fired.

Miller told Bell he wants to avoid any more confrontations with the Hurds but has no means to leave the neighborhood, where he has lived since 2003.

"I just want this all to end. I don't know why it won't. I've lost everything but my family. I've lost my job. I never wanted it to come to this and I had no intentions to hurt Mr. Hurd. I wish him no harm," Miller said.

Miller has maintained he acted in self-defense when he threw Hurd to the ground and claimed he thought he was being attacked with a pickax. That fight happened after Miller accused Hurd of making racial slurs toward his children, who are partially of Asian descent.

Before the trial, Miller rejected an offer from prosecutors to enter a jail diversionary program that would have enabled him not to admit guilt and serve one year on probation.

Thomassey said Miller could not accept that deal and keep his job.

Outside the courtroom, Thomassey said the jail sentence imposed yesterday was appropriate.

"You've got to send a message out that you can't do this," Thomassey said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me