ShareThis Page
News

Westmoreland commissioners scrap project labor deal

Rich Cholodofsky
| Tuesday, April 24, 2012, 5:26 a.m.

Westmoreland County's Republican commissioners on Monday rescinded a labor agreement they said favored union contractors in the bidding process for county construction projects.

To fulfill a promise made during last year's election campaign, commissioners Charles Anderson and Tyler Courtney reversed the 2009 vote by the former Democratic majority board of commissioners who approved the controversial project labor agreement.

"All we want to do is level the playing field. The project labor agreement was pro-union and anti-small business," Anderson said.

The vote was the only general business conducted as the new board of commissioners formally reorganized under the first GOP majority in more than 56 years.

Anderson was elected chairman of the new board and will earn an additional $2,700 for that job, bringing his annual salary to $76,407.

Courtney was named board vice chairman, and Democrat Ted Kopas will serve as secretary. Kopas voted against the reorganization plan.

During last fall's campaign for commissioner, Anderson and Courtney pledged to rescind the labor agreement immediately upon taking office. The agreement, however, will remain in effect until it expires in September.

As originally drafted by the Pittsburgh Region Building and Construction Trades Council, the agreement affected all building projects in excess of $150,000. It required contractors to have specific certifications and mandated they ensure there would be no labor stoppages during construction of the project.

Opponents said the agreement prohibited nonunion shops from bidding on county contracts.

Vincent Fontana Jr., owner of Vince Building Co. in Greensburg, said yesterday that he was unable to bid last year on the construction of a district justice office in Export because of the labor agreement. The Export building was the lone project affected by the labor agreement.

"I did other projects before, but I couldn't bid on the Export project. When you open up more projects to bidding, there is more competition, and it lowers the cost," Fontana said.

Eileen Watt, president of the Association of Builders and Contractors of Western Pennsylvania, issued a statement praising the decision to rescind the project labor agreement.

"PLAs not only cut out competition, but discriminate against women and minority workers as well. That is unacceptable for the taxpayers of Westmoreland County," Watt said.

Anderson said any construction project approved by the county until September will still fall under the labor agreement requirements.

Kopas, who helped to draft the original labor agreement when he worked as chief of staff to former Commissioner Tom Balya, voted against terminating the pact.

"It's proven that it worked. The one project under the PLA came in under budget and on time. We have the proof. Unfortunately, they didn't have an opportunity to meet with the labor council and the dozens of contractors that signed off on the agreement," Kopas said.

Rich Stanizzo, president of the Pittsburgh Building Trades Council, could not be reached for comment.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me