ShareThis Page
News

Dogs, parking on trail concern New Stanton

| Sunday, May 13, 2012, 8:18 p.m.

Dogs and New Stanton Park do not mix, so officials want to find a way to become a friendly stop along the way for those using the Five Star Trail when it reaches the borough limits.

"If pets are a problem, this is an issue," council President Kelly Moore said at Wednesday's meeting.

The New Stanton Recreation Board plans to apply for a grant next month from the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources to construct a walking bridge over a creek at the park that will connect to the trail. However, the borough does not permit dogs in the park, and many trail users walk their pets.

Moore also said parking would become an issue when people leave their vehicles in the park to use the trail.

"Where will this put us if (we connect) to the trail• We need to sit with these people face to face to discuss and resolve these issues," said Moore.

Graham Davis of the recreation board said he would invite a representative from the Five Star Trail to attend the next council meeting to hear the borough's concerns.

On another matter, council told neighbors along Virginia Drive that developer Mark Leonard's plan for his three lots was a private matter because the road is a private street.

Neighbors have been quarreling over the plan approved by council two months ago on the condition that Leonard develop a stormwater management plan.

Solicitor John Campfield said the borough's only connection to plan approval was stormwater management.

In other business, council voted 4-0 to hire Anita Hoffman of Mt. Pleasant as assistant secretary at a rate of $7.21 per hour. Hoffman will be considered a permanent part-time employee and work 26.5 hours per week.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me