ShareThis Page
News Columnists

Camp Hillary's media whining

| Sunday, Dec. 30, 2007

Hillary Clinton has no right to complain that her friends and flatterers in the media are rough on her. But when the Clintons hit rough passages on the road to victory, this is what the Clintons do: complain. That's too meek: They whine.

But she obviously feels wronged by the news media when her polls begin to slip and she looks at Barack Obama's worshipful press clips. In fairy-tale terms, Obama is Snow White and Hillary is the vain and wicked queen peering into the mirror and demanding to know, "Who is the fairest one of all?"

She can easily come to a boil over Time's Obama cover on the Dec. 10 issue, where Obama stands in a heroic pose with arms folded, surrounded by a glow that makes him look like a saintly icon. She can wince as he's cast as both a greater force for idealism and target of discrimination while she's merely part of "machine" politics.

On ABC, morning anchor Chris "Son of Mario" Cuomo asked Obama, "What do you think the bigger obstacle is for you in becoming president, the Clinton campaign machine or America's inherent racism?"

In other words, America doesn't deserve glowing Saint Barack -- unless, of course, we all vote for him to demonstrate eagerly and apologetically that we reject our inherent prejudices. But this is where we go back to the underlying silliness of Hillary's whining.

Hillary's complaint of a harsh media microscope appeared in The Washington Post on Dec. 19. Media reporter Howard Kurtz used Time editor-at-large Mark Halperin to act as Hillary's unofficial press secretary. "She's just held to a different standard in every respect," sulked Halperin. "The press rooted for Obama to go negative, and when he did, he was applauded. When she does it, it's treated as this huge violation of propriety."

While Clinton's mistakes deserve full coverage, Halperin says, "the press' flaws -- wild swings, accentuating the negative -- are magnified 50 times when it comes to her. It's not a level playing field."

When conservatives make a case for media bias to a liberal, it's important (in fact, it's absolutely imperative) that they deliver factual evidence examples -- quotes, studies, surveys, you name it. And it's never enough in the eyes of the press. But if you're a liberal, particularly a liberal in the media, and you want to accuse the press of tacking left, it's acceptable to pull wild figures out of the air.

Hillary's flaws are "magnified 50 times"• What media outlet is he following• Or is he reading someone else's talking points?

Halperin is talking as a media insider. He's complaining not simply about what's appeared in the media but what he thinks is his colleagues' collective mood. The idea that Hillary's treated as if she'd ever committed a "huge violation of propriety" might be something that liberals debate inside their newsrooms or at the corner bar, but it's not something a voter has seen this year in the "mainstream" press. It simply isn't there.

Halperin accuses his colleagues of choosing sides. "Your typical reporter has a thinly disguised preference that Barack Obama be the nominee. The narrative of him beating her is better than her beating him, in part because she's a Clinton and in part because he's a young African American. ... There's no one rooting for her to come back."

Newsday reporter Glenn Thrush was not amused and quickly blogged that Halperin was imagining things. "Who's the 'typical' reporter• As a card-carrying Typical who spends more time with Hillary Rodham Clinton than (with) his family, I have never heard a print or broadcast reporter in the trenches express a preference for Obama -- overt, thinly or thickly disguised, or otherwise."

Kurtz did not tell the reader that Halperin's ardor about a Hillary-betraying media might be due to his connections to the Clintons. Most Americans first learned of Halperin as the ABC producer who slipped George Stephanopoulos a copy of Clinton's "thank you for saving me from the draft" letter in 1992, helping keep Clinton's draft-dodging past from sinking his campaign.

Most Americans don't know that Mark Halperin is the son of ultraliberal Morton Halperin, who not only served in Bill Clinton's administration but helped found the Center for American Progress, Hillary's think tank and government in exile. He's now second-in-command there. Halperin's brother, David, also worked in the Clinton administration and works now at the Center for American Progress.

Knowing these things makes it easier to judge the motivation behind his wild accusations.

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me