ShareThis Page
News Columnists

Aiding & abetting illegals

| Friday, July 13, 2007

The New Sanctuary Movement in the U.S. -- houses of worship harboring illegal aliens -- is performing miracles. Dumbstruck liberals have stopped braying about the separation of church and state and questioning the tax-exempt status of religious organizations involved in political issues.

God works in strange and mysterious ways.

The movement is a growing coalition of churches, synagogues and other places of worship that is challenging the immigration system, according to USA Today. The sanctuaristas -- from New York to San Diego, Chicago to Miami -- help illegals facing deportation.

The men and women of God want the feds to stop raiding job sites to catch illegals. And they're lobbying for policies that would help aliens' families stay together, anchored in their adopted homeland, the newspaper reported.

A picture of Liliana, 29, a doe-eyed factory worker from Mexico with gold jewelry on her wedding ring finger, was on the front page of Monday's edition.

The newspaper said she crossed the border illegally in 1998. Five immigration agents came to apprehend her in May. She said to them, "What about my children• I have a baby. I'm nursing."

They caved. They told her she could report to a detention center five days later for deportation.

Instead, she hid at the home of a Catholic deacon. Her latest address and deportation defender is St. Luke's Episcopal Church in Long Beach, reports USA Today.

Yes, the government may enter the buildings to apprehend suspects such as Liliana. But how would those pictures look on the front page, on a Web site or on nonstop cable news channels• Liliana-gate is one of several Mexican standoffs involving the sanctuary movement and the state.

Immigration law is being violated in the name of a noble tradition. But those wanting sanctuary today are not the hopeless and hapless who faced almost certain death with no other available refuge. The Middle Ages was ages ago.

The ones being protected today came to America voluntarily. They were not being chased. They may leave whenever they wish. The sooner the better.

Does anything prevent the illegals from standing in line with the law-abiding aliens who have been waiting patiently to someday earn American citizenship legally?

Immigration law is being ignored by tens of millions of illegals, their U.S. employers and the federal government that's supposed to enforce the law. So many laws are being ignored that an illegal can live in the U.S. as a virtual citizen, opening bank accounts, buying cars and houses, accessing government programs while not paying income taxes and, if otherwise eligible, not registering for the draft.

When obeying the law doesn't matter to anyone else, why should it matter to the sanctuary movement?

This perversion of religion is another example of transformational anarchy -- the unofficial bipartisan, inside-the-Beltway policy to ignore the rule of law. The goal seems to be to slowly undermine the U.S. It's as if rebar enhancing the strength of poured concrete is purposely compromised to hasten the cracking, crumbling and collapse of America's foundation.

Post-Americans of the New World Order then could attempt nation-building by turning North America into a super state.

God help the republic.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me