ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

Proof required

| Thursday, March 20, 2003

I'm writing in response to Jack Baird's demeaning comments regarding the Westmoreland County Food Bank and the firemen who provided assistance (" Food bank crisis? ," March 6). This is a 99 percent justifiable cause or the firemen would not respond.

All food bank recipients are required to provide proof of financial status at the food bank via an access card or similar identification. The IDs are needed to get food each month, and the recipient must sign up for each allotment, period!

Each year the recipients are required to prove their financial status. There are laws for fraudulent use of food stamps and these programs. If Mr. Baird knows of someone who is providing false information, I suggest he contact his local welfare office.

Regarding his comment about newer cars being seen at the food bank locations: That's none of his business. Some people get rides to these places to receive their food box and don't own vehicles or cell phones! Before he judges these people, he ought to make sure they didn't borrow the phone.

Also, if they want to smoke, there is no law against that. I don't smoke, but the last time I checked it was still a free country!

Kevan Kolling

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me