ShareThis Page
Letters to the Editor

FDR's Good Deal

| Wednesday, June 20, 2007

When we speak of "OPM" (Other People's Money), the OP represents the "Forgotten Man" writ large.

Readers can be grateful to "The Forgotten Man" author Amity Shlaes for resurrecting the nearly forgotten political economist William Graham Sumner, who coined the expression the "Forgotten Man," which FDR craftily purloined and then stood on its head ("A tale of political economics," Q&A, June 16 and

That said, Ms. Shlaes seemed a bit too facile in dismissing FDR's New Deal.

I'd have liked to ask her if she's read Robert Caro's harrowing descriptions of the Texas Hill Country, whose people were Lyndon Johnson's people. One New Deal program alone, the Rural Electrification Act, ended the unrelieved drudgery and mind-numbing tedium that summed up their lives.

The attitude of the private utilities was not that rural electric service could not be profitable, but that it would not be as profitable as urban service. Because they wouldn't take the capital risk, Roosevelt acted through the REA.

After the lights went on in 1939, the farm women in Johnson's Hill Country had electric washers, electric irons and an antidote to boredom: the radio. They began to name their babies for LBJ.

Bob G. Wyeth Homestead

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me