ShareThis Page

Yom Kippur: Sin and freedom

| Monday, Oct. 6, 2003

Before we can be held responsible for our transgressions against God and man, we must have free will -- the capacity to know right from wrong, the power to choose and the knowledge we have acted for good or for ill.

Today, Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, can occasion spiritual agony. There is a certainty that we will fall short of the ideal -- a life without sin -- no matter the effort.

Faith is essential. We must have faith that we receive the grace to improve. We must remember also that despairing of self -improvement sets one on a road to despotism.

Despots reject religion or co-opt it. In each case the despot endeavors to become the religious focus by engaging the power of the state against the person's right to seek God in his own way.

In these places of damnation, life is lived for the state -- a godless one or a theocratic one. Free will has no place.

This page, as readers know, rejects the utter secularization of public life as well as the theocratic instinct. In either case, we would lose sight of the fundamental right of the independent person to seek an intimate relationship with a higher power.

Today we ponder atonement, the rejection of sin and the lifelong mission of self-improvement. We hope that when life's journey has ended, we may say it is better we lived into the fullness of our years.

In freedom.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me