ShareThis Page
News

Chavez & nukes

| Monday, Oct. 24, 2005

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is like a freshman pledge during rush week begging to join a fraternity of nuclear misfits. Iran and North Korea could be his frat brothers.

Mr. Chavez -- whose admiration of Cuban tyrant Fidel Castro proves he is as disturbed as he is dangerous -- has spent considerable energy trying to secure nuclear technology from rogue states such as Iran. Nuclear technology is needed to produce nuclear weaponry.

American intelligence does not have clear evidence he is plotting to produce deadly nukes. Yet.

However, there's no evidence the two countries even need nuclear power since they are awash in oil. But does anyone doubt they'd love to have the nuclear option to detonate their Marxist or Islamic revolutions?

Venezuela's vast oil reserves are fueling Chavez's megalomania. His lust for new jet fighters and a satellite in space suggests he will not be satiated even when his order for 100,000 AK-47 assault rifles is fulfilled.

When asked if he felt threatened by the United States, Chavez said that "I am on the offensive because attack is the best form of defense."

The attack on 9/11 should have taught this republic that enemy threats always -- always -- must be taken seriously.

Chavez acts as if the lesson still has not been learned. One more reason to keep him on a short leash with a choke collar.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me