ShareThis Page

More corporate wealthfare: Rendell's 'generosity'

| Tuesday, Oct. 25, 2005

Gov. Ed Rendell is throwing, or is about to throw, your money at some very profitable business concerns.

American Eagle Outfitters is moving its headquarters from Marshall to Pittsburgh's South Side. That is, from one part of Allegheny County to another.

Mr. Rendell is offering the hip clothier $5.5 million in taxpayer money, of which $1 million is an outright grant. There's $4 million in taxpayer-underwritten low-interest loans, split between the new SouthSide Works headquarters and American Eagle's distribution center, also in Marshall; there's $500,000 in job-training assistance.

American Eagle achieved its sixth consecutive quarter of record sales and earnings in the second fiscal quarter; third-quarter earnings are due next month.

And taxpayers are being forced to subsidize the effort?

Sometime in November, PNC Financial Services Group is expected to announce what it plans to do with a group of Golden Triangle properties that it has been banking. Gov. Rendell says it's a "huge project"; his administration and PNC are "negotiating" an undisclosed public subsidy.

Since July, PNC has laid off 200 workers in Pittsburgh. PNC posted a third-quarter profit of $334 million.

And taxpayers will help pay for its new Downtown development?

Two very profitable companies want to grow. That's wonderful. And we're glad that American Eagle and PNC have made commitments to Pittsburgh. But it's no excuse for Ed Rendell to dip into the public purse. These companies have the financial wherewithal to pay for, or finance, these projects themselves.

This is corporate wealthfare. And this has to stop.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me