ShareThis Page
News

Pittsburgh Tuesday takes

| Tuesday, May 9, 2006

Investigating Diven: If state Rep. Michael Diven thought his campaign's use of at least six dead people on his re-election nominating petitions would fade away, he has gotten a rude awakening. An assistant Allegheny County solicitor has told elections boss Mark Wolosik that the matter should be referred to Allegheny County Police for an investigation. Mr. Diven withdrew from the 22nd Legislative District primary race. He blamed a lazy campaign worker but took full responsibility. Elections fraud is a serious charge; the proverbial book should be thrown at Diven.

Another sour deal: Departing Heinz Europe boss Joseph Jimenez is getting a big payday for eight years of service. There's a lump-sum payment of just under $948,000. Then there's a $152,000 payment come late October. Then there's $55,000 a month, beginning in November and continuing through April 2008, depending on how long Mr. Jimenez is out of work. Which, coincidentally, likely will continue through April 2008. And even though he's out, there also will be a bonus. And corporate compensation committees wonder why they have a bad reputation.

Can the Bucs regroup?: The struggling Pittsburgh Pirates open a nine-game homestand tonight. The Arizona Diamondbacks are first up. The Bucs enter the series as one of the worst teams in all of Major League Baseball with nine wins on 24 losses. And unless something starts clicking, the Pirates remain on pace to set a record -- most losses in a season. This is not what the team's landlords -- the taxpayers -- were promised.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me